The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6858•John Willie Mack, Jr. v. ANTHONY C. LIEBERT, Assistant Solicitor
11-6858Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6858
JOHN WILLIE MACK, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY C. LIEBERT, Assistant Solicitor,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
J. ROGER POOLE, Public Defender,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (7:10-cv-02372-DCN)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Willie Mack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Calhoun Haskell,
III, SMITH & HASKELL, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Willie Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. Mack v. Liebert, No. 7:10-cv-02372-DCN
(D.S.C. June 16, 2011 & June 17, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.