The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6755•Eugene Jerome Cunningham v. Warden Fci Bennettsville
11-6755Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6755
EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FCI BENNETTSVILLE,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Municipal
Incorporation,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (9:10-cv-02105-CMC)
Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Jerome Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.
2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Cunningham v. Warden, No. 9:10-cv-02105-
CMC (D.S.C. June 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.