The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6731•Anthony Lamar Snipe v. Bureau of Prisons; Mildred L. Rivera
11-6731Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 5, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6731
ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS; MILDRED L. RIVERA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:10-cv-02686-SB)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Lamar Snipe seeks to appeal the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation that relief be denied on
Snipe’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Snipe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.