The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6699•United States of America v. Derek Marquis Fleming
11-6699Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6699
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:91-cr-00179-NCT-1)
Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derek Marquis Fleming appeals the district court’s
order denying Fleming’s motion to reconsider the order denying
Fleming’s motion to correct a clerical error in its judgment
pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fleming,
No. 2:91-cr-00179-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.