The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6691•United States of America v. Albert Randolph, a/k/a Spo
11-6691Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6691
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALBERT RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:01-cr-00304-JRS-11)
Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey,
Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, David Novak,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Albert Randolph appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a
reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Randolph, No. 3:01-cr-
00304-JRS-11 (E.D. Va. May 6, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.