The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6683•United States of America v. Michael L. Moore, a/k/a Gadget
11-6683Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 29, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6683
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1)
Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 29, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Edward Patricco,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael L. Moore appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Moore, No.
1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.