The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6676•Craig Latwain Chestnut v. Angelina L. Brown, Dho; Donovan Green; James Tollison
11-6676Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6676
CRAIG LATWAIN CHESTNUT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANGELINA L. BROWN, DHO; DONOVAN GREEN; JAMES TOLLISON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION INSTITUTION
TURBEVILLE CORRECTION INSTITUTION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-01784-RMG)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Craig Latwain Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Arlene Thomas,
THOMPSON & HENRY, PA, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and conclude there is no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Chestnut v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-01784-RMG
(D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.