The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6671•Sheridan A. Glaze v. Department of Defense
11-6671Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 2, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6671
SHERIDAN A. GLAZE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; DEFENSE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
SERVICE, DCIS; TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY, TMA; PALMETTO
GOVERNMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATORS, PGBA; INOVA HEALTH
SYSTEM; SHARP HEALTH SYSTEMS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-00311-LO-JFA)
Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sheridan A. Glaze, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Glaze v. Department of Defense, No. 1:11-cv-00311-LO-JFA
(E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 5, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.