The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6652•United States of America v. Wilbert Decosta Greaves
11-6652Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 26, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6652
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WILBERT DECOSTA GREAVES,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt,
Senior District Judge. (7:95-cr-00038-BR-1)
Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 26, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilbert DeCosta Greaves, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon
James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wilbert DeCosta Greaves appeals the district court’s
order denying Greaves’ motion for reconsideration of his
previously denied request for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Because the district court
lacked the authority to consider Greaves’ motion for
reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233,
235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010), we
affirm the district court’s order denying the motion. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.