The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6649•United States of America v. Lennell Dyches
11-6649Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6649
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LENNELL DYCHES,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1)
Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lennell Dyches, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order
denying his self-styled motion to supplement the record in his
criminal matter, and his motion for stenographic notes from his
criminal matter. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1
(D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.