The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6592•Curtis D. Shuler v. RICHARD NEELY, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution
11-6592Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6592
CURTIS D. SHULER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD NEELY, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional
Institution; C. W. CLARK, Supervisor, Food Management,
Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. BENNETT, Supervisor,
Programs, Lanesboro Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00182-RJC)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis D. Shuler appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and conclude
there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Shuler v. Neely, No.
3:11-cv-00182-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.