The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6569•ALFRED L. FORBES, JR., a/k/a James Forbes v. VIRGINIA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, Precinct 2; HARVEY BRYANT; WILLIAM SESSOMS
11-6569Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 21, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6569
ALFRED L. FORBES, JR., a/k/a James Forbes,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, Precinct #2; HARVEY
BRYANT; WILLIAM SESSOMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00007-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: June 16, 2011 Decided: June 21, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alfred L. Forbes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alfred L. Forbes, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee and failing to apply
to proceed without prepayment of the fee under 18 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Forbes v. Virginia Beach Police Dep’t,
No. 2:11-cv-00007-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.