The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6539•T. Terell Bryan, a/k/a Terence Bryan, a/k/a Terence Terell Bryan v. D. Tatarsky
11-6539Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 5, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6539
T. TERELL BRYAN, a/k/a Terence Bryan, a/k/a Terence Terell
Bryan,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
D. TATARSKY; OFC BUEHLER; IGC COCCIOLONE; MR. NAJJAR; ASST
WARDEN CLAYTOR; WARDEN MCCALL; M. CAROLINA LINDSEY; JAMES
SIMMONS, III,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SCDC; IGC,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-03556-TLW)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
T. Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Bryan v. Tatarsky, No. 1:08-cv-03556-TLW (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2011).
We also deny Bryan’s pending motion to produce. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.