The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6531•Olee Wonzo Robinson v. MARY M. MITCHELL, Warden FCI Edgefield
11-6531Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 5, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6531
OLEE WONZO ROBINSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARY M. MITCHELL, Warden FCI Edgefield,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-02289-SB)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Olee Wonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Olee Wonzo Robinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Robinson v. Mitchell, No. 3:10-
cv-02289-SB (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2011). We grant Robinson’s motion
to strike his initial informal brief and deny his motions for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.