United States of America v. Jamal Mitchell, a/k/a Boo

11-6461Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 2, 2011

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6461
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1)
Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R.
Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse
of discretion. United States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d
Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. 1:02-cr-
00025-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.