The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6393•Naarl Richard v. PRITCHARD, Det; JASON ROY, Det; D. BAILEY, Officer; M. HUGHES
11-6393Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 6, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6393
NAARL RICHARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PRITCHARD, Det; JASON ROY, Det; D. BAILEY, Officer;
M. HUGHES,
Respondents – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (0:10-cv-02022-PMD)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Naarl Richard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Naarl Richard, a federal pretrial detainee, appeals
the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge, in part, and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Richard v. Pritchard,
No. 0:10-cv-02022-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.