The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6337•Percy Allen Williams, Jr. v. Graham C. Mullen; William B. Traxler
11-6337Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6337
PERCY ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GRAHAM C. MULLEN; WILLIAM B. TRAXLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00621-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Percy Allen Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr., appeals the district
court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and his motion to reconsider. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Williams’ motion to amend his complaint and affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Mullen,
No. 2:10-cv-00621-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.