The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6318•Marketta Denise Humes-Jones v. Dr. Jamulden
11-6318Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 6, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6318
MARKETTA DENISE HUMES-JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DR. JAMULDEN,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
VIRGINIA BEACH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00228-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marketta Denise Humes-Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin
Muldowney, Kimberly Jane Raab, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marketta Denise Humes-Jones appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Humes-Jones v. Jamulden, No. 1:10-cv-00228-
GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.