The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6300•Orlando Alfaro v. United States of America; D. Stephens; Mack Bonner; Maite Serrano-Mercado
11-6300Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6300
ORLANDO ALFARO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; D. STEPHENS; MACK BONNER; MAITE
SERRANO-MERCADO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-3073-D)
Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando Alfaro, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Alfaro appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 -
2680. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Alfaro v. United States, No. 5:09-ct-3073-D
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2011). We also deny Alfaro’s motion to extend
or stay the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.