The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6283•United States of America v. Michael Antonio Womack
11-6283Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 6, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6283
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL ANTONIO WOMACK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:07-cr-00104-JAB-1)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Antonio Womack, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Antonio Womack appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Womack, No. 1:07-cr-00104-
JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.