The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6257•Carl Lorinzo Capers v. CLARK, Kitchen Dietician
11-6257Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6257
CARL LORINZO CAPERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CLARK, Kitchen Dietician; HARRINGTON, Kitchen Dietician;
BULLOCK, Unit Superintendent; RICHARD NEELY, Supervisor of
Administrations; EDITH WALRATH, Medical Supervisor; ALDRIDGE;
KORY DALRYMPLE; LAWRENCE PARSONS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00048-RJC)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Lorinzo Capers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carl Lorinzo Capers appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Capers v. Clark, No. 3:11-cv-00048-RJC
(W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.