The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6216•United States of America v. Hosea Fanadise Hampton
11-6216Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 13, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6216
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HOSEA FANADISE HAMPTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:99-cr-00320-JAB-1)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 13, 2011
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hosea Fanadise Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hosea Fanadise Hampton appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Hampton, No. 1:99-cr-00320-JAB-1
(M.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.