The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6210•Eugene A. Fischer v. United States of America
11-6210Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 6, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6210
EUGENE A. FISCHER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03048-D)
Submitted: June 22, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene A. Fischer, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene A. Fischer appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Fischer v. United States, No. 5:09-ct-03048-D
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.