The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6124•Sherman A. Thompson v. OFFICER RICHARDSON; TARACE CARSON, Officer
11-6124Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 9, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6124
SHERMAN A. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER RICHARDSON; TARACE CARSON, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03161-BO)
Submitted: August 30, 2011 Decided: September 9, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherman A. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sherman A. Thompson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Thompson v. Richardson, No. 5:09-ct-03161-BO (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 19, 2011). We deny Thompson’s motion to file an amended
complaint and we dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.