United States of America v. Howell Way Woltz

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6093
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HOWELL WAY WOLTZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00438-WEB)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howell Way Woltz, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Howell Way Woltz appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for sanctions, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 11(c), and for a different judge to conduct a hearing on his
motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and we
conclude there was no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States
v. Woltz, No. 3:08-cv-00438-WEB (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --