The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6046•Mahmoud A. Benstone v. ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent
11-6046Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 27, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6046
MAHMOUD A. BENSTONE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00313-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mahmoud A. Benstone, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mahmoud A. Benstone appeals the district court’s order
awarding summary judgment to Roy W. Cherry in this 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Benstone v. Cherry, No. 1:10-cv-00313-
JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 22, 2010 & entered Dec. 23, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.