H. Richard Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates; Stephen Houghton; Jimmy Pau

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2427
H. RICHARD AUSTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOUGLAS G. PETERSON & ASSOCIATES; STEPHEN HOUGHTON; JIMMY
PAU,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00373-BR)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
H. Richard Austin, Appellant Pro Se. George L. Goodridge,
CURTISS, CAREY, GATES, GRAVES & GOODRIDGE, LLP, Greenfield,
Massachusetts; Paul Marshall Yoder, WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER,
PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
H. Richard Austin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his claims against all defendants. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas
G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:11-cv-00373-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --