The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2417•Tommy Lee Stevens v. Unknown Name Clerk of U.s. Congressman Walter Jones Greenville, Nc District Office
11-2417Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2417
TOMMY LEE STEVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN NAME CLERK OF U.S. CONGRESSMAN WALTER JONES
GREENVILLE, NC DISTRICT OFFICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00519-FL)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Lee Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Lee Stevens appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion to reopen and affirming its earlier
order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
dismissing his mandamus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Stevens v. Unknown Name Clerk, No. 5:11-cv-
00519-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.