The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2399•Carolina First Bank v. Charles Stambaugh; Camilla Stambaugh
11-2399Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2399
CAROLINA FIRST BANK,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES STAMBAUGH; CAMILLA STAMBAUGH,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00174-MR-DLH)
Submitted: June 12, 2012 Decided: June 14, 2012
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles L. Stambaugh, STAMBAUGH & ASSOCIATES, P.A.,
Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellants. Lance P. Martin, WARD &
SMITH, PA, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles and Camilla Stambaugh appeal the district
court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment and
granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the judgment of the district court. Carolina First
Bank v. Stambaugh, No. 1:10-cv-00174-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.