Simhah Tamar v. Geico Casualty Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2395
SIMHAH TAMAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY; GEICO
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01067-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 24, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Simhah Tamar, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Jacob Borovsky, JACKSON
LEWIS, LLP, Reston, Virginia; Bruce Stephen Harrison, Fiona W.
Ong, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Simhah Tamar appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing
her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co.,
No. 1:10-cv-01067-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --