The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2375•Xuli Zhang v. Police S. Regan; Police Pec. M. Green
11-2375Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2375
XULI ZHANG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
POLICE S. REGAN; POLICE PEC. M. GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan,
Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-01329-TCB)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Xuli Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Xuli Zhang appeals the magistrate judge’s order
denying her post-judgment motion to correct the clerk’s mistake.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. Zhang v. Regan, No. 1:10-cv-01329-TCB (E.D. Va. filed
Dec. 7, 2011 & entered Dec. 8, 2011). We deny Zhang’s motions
for sanctions and for relief from the judgment. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.