The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2360•Marla Crawford v. Department of Correctional Education
11-2360Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2360
MARLA CRAWFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00430-HEH)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Joseph Mulcunry,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marla Crawford appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her employment discrimination and retaliation
claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Crawford v. Dep’t of Corr. Educ., No. 3:11-cv-
00430-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.