The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2349•Ronnie G. Arnold v. FOLA COAL COMPANY, LLC, a West Virginia corporation
11-2349Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2349
RONNIE G. ARNOLD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FOLA COAL COMPANY, LLC, a West Virginia corporation; and
CONSOL ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00908)
Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 25, 2012
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne King, LAW OFFICE OF WAYNE KING, Clay, West Virginia, for
Appellant. Bryan R. Cokeley, Joseph U. Leonoro, STEPTOE &
JOHNSON PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie G. Arnold appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his age
discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the West Virginia
Human Rights Act, W. Va. Code Ann. §§ 5-11-1 to 5-11-20
(LexisNexis 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. See Arnold v. Fola Coal Co., LLC, No. 2:10-cv-00908
(S.D. W. Va. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.