The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2324•Alexander A. Johnson v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp.
11-2324Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 4, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2324
ALEXANDER A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PROSPERITY MORTGAGE CORP.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.S.; WELLS
FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; JOHN S. BURSON, Substitute Trustee;
WILLIAM M. SAVAGE, Substitute Trustee; GREGORY N. BRITTO,
Substitute Trustee; JASON MURPHY, Substitute Trustee;
KRISTINE D. BROWN, Substitute Trustee; ERIK W. YODER,
Substitute Trustee,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:11-cv-02532-AW)
Submitted: December 21, 2012 Decided: January 4, 2013
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Solomon, SOLOMON & BASCIETTO, LLC, Boynton Beach,
Florida, for Appellant. Amy S. Owen, Richard D. Holzheimer,
Jr., COCHRAN & OWEN, LLC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander A. Johnson appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a judgment
quieting title to real property, a declaratory judgment, and an
accounting. The district court determined that Johnson’s
complaint failed to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed
the record and the briefs submitted on appeal and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Johnson v. Prosperity Mortg. Corp., No.
8:11–cv–02532–AW (D. Md. Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.