Andersson Gustafsson Advokatbyra Kb v. Ralph D. Genuario; Dr. Maija Harkonen; John Packard

11-2300Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 9, 2012

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2300
ANDERSSON GUSTAFSSON ADVOKATBYRA KB,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RALPH D. GENUARIO; DR. MAIJA HARKONEN; JOHN PACKARD,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ESCRUB SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00632-LO-TRJ)
Submitted: April 30, 2012 Decided: May 9, 2012
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Michael Holm, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellant. Ralph D. Genuario, Alexandria, Virginia; Dr.
Maija Harkonen, Alexandria, Virginia, Appellees Pro Se. Eric J.
Berghold, Robert H. J. Loftus, MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, PC,
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee John Packard.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Andersson Gustafsson Advokatbyra KB appeals the
district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of
Appellee John Packard on the Appellant’s claim of
misrepresentation, denying default judgment against Appellees
Ralph Genuario and Maija Harkonen and dismissing the Appellant’s
claims against them, and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Advokatbyra KB v. Genuario, No. 1:10-cv-00632-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va.
Sept. 7 & 26, 2011; Oct. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.