The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2242•Soudani Alexis v. Albertini & Darby
11-2242Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2242
SOUDANI ALEXIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALBERTINI & DARBY; PATRICK MARLIN WYSONG; PERRY MATTHEW DARBY;
GUY MARCEL ALBERTINI, and all other associate(s),
subsidiarie(s), holding(s), asset(s), hereunder; 15 U.S.C.A.
Section 80(a)(2), et al,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:11-cv-00113-WDQ)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Soudani Alexis, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Young Brennan, ILIFF,
MEREDITH, WILDBERGER & BRENNAN, P.C., Pasadena, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Soudani Alexis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Alexis v. Albertini & Darby, No. 1:11-cv-00113-WDQ (D.
Md. Oct. 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.