The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2169•Thomas Michaels v. Continental Realty Corporation
11-2169Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2169
THOMAS MICHAELS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL REALTY CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01998-RDB)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Michaels, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Mark Feldenzer,
Neil Serotte, SEROTTE ROCKMAN AND WESTCOTT, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Michaels appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his claims brought pursuant to the Americans with
Disabilities Act and Maryland law. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Michaels v. Continental
Realty Corp., No. 1:10-cv-01998-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 26, 2011). We
deny Appellee’s motion to reconsider and vacate the Clerk’s
order granting Michaels an extension in which to file his
informal opening brief, and to dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.