The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2128•Christopher Q. Reid v. Eg>echnical Services, Inc.
11-2128Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2128
CHRISTOPHER Q. REID,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate
Judge. (2:10-cv-00448-TEM)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Q. Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas,
JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Q. Reid appeals the magistrate judge’s
final order granting EG&G Technical Services Inc.’s motion for
summary judgment.* We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Reid v. EG&G Technical Servs., Inc., No.
2:10-cv-00448-TEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2011). We deny Reid’s
pending motions to seal. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by
the magistrate judge, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.