The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2113•Rose Isbell v. Stephen Friedman; Joseph, Greenwald and Laake, Pa
11-2113Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 13, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2113
ROSE ISBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEPHEN FRIEDMAN; JOSEPH, GREENWALD AND LAAKE, PA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:11-cv-01152-AW)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rose Isbell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Michael Creed, Veronica
B. Nannis, JOSEPH, GREENWALD & LAAKE, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rose Isbell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Isbell v. Friedman, No. 8:11-cv-01152-AW (D. Md. filed
Sept. 16, 2011, entered Sept. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.