The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2053•Benjamin Tate v. Nc Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Charlotte, Incorporated
11-2053Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 11, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2053
BENJAMIN TATE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NC PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF CHARLOTTE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00036-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: May 8, 2012 Decided: May 11, 2012
Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lena Watts-Robinson, LAW OFFICE OF LEAN WATTS-ROBINSON, P.A.,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Randall D. Avram,
Michael T. Rosenberg, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Tate appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for the Appellee on Tate’s claims of
disability and race discrimination and intentional infliction of
emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., No.
3:09-cv-00036-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.