The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2049•Michelle Parham v. Mid Atlantic Baking Company
11-2049Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 21, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2049
MICHELLE PARHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MID ATLANTIC BAKING COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:11-cv-00185-WDQ)
Submitted: December 16, 2011 Decided: December 21, 2011
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelle Parham, Appellant Pro Se. John Constantine Themelis,
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN C. THEMELIS, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Parham appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint of discrimination under the Americans
with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101-12213 (West 2005 &
Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Parham v. Mid Atlantic Baking Co., No. 1:11-cv-
00185-WDQ (D. Md. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.