The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2026•Khadirah Ma’at T. El-Bey; Asaru Alim N.t. El-Bey v. City of Raleigh Police Department
11-2026Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2026
KHADIRAH MA’AT T. EL-BEY; ASARU ALIM N.T. EL-BEY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
CITY OF RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT; J. S. VARNELL; DAVID
SHELTON; A. J. MOSER; M. J. CORSO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00275-BO)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khadirah Ma’at T. El-Bey and Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey, Appellants
Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Khadirah Ma’at T. El-Bey and Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey
appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing their complaint as
untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. El-Bey v. Raleigh Police Dep’t, No. 5:11-cv-
00275-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.