The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2017•Laura K. Mechem v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.a.
11-2017Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 10, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2017
LAURA K. MECHEM,
Debtor – Appellant,
and
DARLENE G. MECHEM,
Debtor,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Creditor - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00026-JPB; 3:11-cv-00025-JPB;
3:11-cv-00027-JPB; 3:02-bk-31227; 3:03-bk-00882)
Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 10, 2012
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian J. McAuliffe, LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN J. MCAULIFFE,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Terrance Rodgers,
GUTHRIE & THOMAS, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Laura K. Mechem appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for rehearing or reconsideration of the
district court’s order reversing the portion of the bankruptcy
court’s order which authorized her to file a new adversary
proceeding addressing the claims that were the subject of her
previously dismissed adversary proceeding. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Mechem v. JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A., No. 3:11-cv-00026-JPB; 3:11-cv-00025-JPB;
3:11-cv-00027-JPB; 3:02-bk-31227; 3:03-bk-00882 (N.D. W. Va.
Aug. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.