The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1968•James L. Roudabush v. Thomas M. Belk, Jr.
11-1968Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 13, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1968
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THOMAS M. BELK, JR.; BELK STORES, INC.; JAN W. WALKE;
HARNEY; SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SHERIFF; WILLIAM NEELY; JOHN
DOE, Loss Prevention Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00255-GCM)
Submitted: January 17, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James L. Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James L. Roudabush appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Belk,
No. 3:11-cv-00255-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8 & 19, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.