The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1928•William Thomas Davis v. John Richard Yeager, Jr.
11-1928Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1928
WILLIAM THOMAS DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN RICHARD YEAGER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00061-FPS-JES)
Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 30, 2011
Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Thomas Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Thomas Davis appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Davis v. Yeager, No. 5:11-cv-
00061-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.