The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1903•Anthony Oliver v. Gleamns Human Resource Commission Inc.
11-1903Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1903
ANTHONY OLIVER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GLEAMNS HUMAN RESOURCE COMMISSION INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:10-cv-01191-JMC)
Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 6, 2012
Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Oliver, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edgar McDonald, III,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Oliver appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Oliver’s
claims of discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Oliver v. Gleamns Human Resource
Comm’n, Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01191-JMC (D.S.C. July 26, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.