Andrea Parris v. Baltimore County Board of Education

11-1891Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2012

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1891
ANDREA PARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-00704-BEL)
Submitted: May 25, 2012 Decided: June 4, 2012
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH & ASSOCIATES,
PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Leslie R. Stellman, Lisa
Y. Settles, HODES, PESSIN & KATZ, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Andrea Parris appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part and the
court’s final order granting Defendant’s renewed motion for
summary judgment in Parris’ civil action alleging employment
discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Parris v. Baltimore Cnty. Bd. of Educ.,
No. 1:09-cv-00704-BEL (D. Md. entered Dec. 8, 2010 & July 26,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.