The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1825•Ronald Luber v. Anne Arundel County Maryland
11-1825Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 10, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1825
RONALD LUBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MARYLAND; ANNE HATCHER, in her official
capacity; MARY ROBERTS; DANIEL KANE, in his official
capacity; ROBERT HUBBARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-00237-RDB)
Submitted: December 6, 2011 Decided: January 10, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Luber, Appellant Pro Se. Philip E. Culpepper, ANNE
ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Luber appeals the district court’s order
granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Luber v. Anne Arundel Cnty., Md., No. 1:11-cv-
00237-RDB (D. Md. filed July 12, 2011; entered July 20, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.