The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1803•Ern Reynolds v. City of Roanoke
11-1803Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1803
ERN REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ROANOKE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00260-JCT)
Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011
Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ern Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Collins, OFFICE OF
THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ern Reynolds appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his action alleging various constitutional violations
with respect to application of zoning ordinances and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. City of
Roanoke, No. 7:10-cv-00260-JCT (W.D. Va. July 13, 2011; July 19,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.