The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1751•In re: Jerrell S. Casey, a/k/a Jerrell Casey, a/k/a Rell
11-1751Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 12, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1751
In re: JERRELL S. CASEY, a/k/a Jerrell Casey, a/k/a Rell,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:10-cv-00588-JRS)
(3:09-cr-00282-JRS-1)
Submitted: August 23, 2011 Decided: September 12, 2011
Before DAVIS and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerrell S. Casey, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerrell S. Casey petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied relief
on the motion. Accordingly, because the district court has
recently decided Casey’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.